Thanks for all your contributions. I am afraid I slept through most of them. Being in Europe I am out of synch with most contributors.
I find the difference between a clone and a copy interesting, I think that if you are a believer it carries little significance. Basically you have a basic cosy idea and you sprinkle fairy dust over it so that the glitches and anomalies are healed up and give the golden glow at funerals.
The problem for me though is similar to the conception nightmare. There was a race between countless spermatozoa to fuse with the ovum that became me. What if another one had won? There would have been someone else walking the Earth in my place, born in the same town to the same parents with the same siblings but it would not be me. In the WT resurrection, there will be someone walking in my shoes, in my image, saying my (apostate) words but he will not be me. I will be dead.
Here are another couple of spanners in the works, the ones that set me thinking.
Jesus’ resurrection:
1. He was materialised in an unrecognisable body, why? He was perfect as a man, why change his appearance?
2. He was materialised with the wounds of the nails in his hands, why? Does this mean that people will be resurrected with bits missing? The WT teaches that we will be resurrected with our missing bits restored; the illnesses that finished us off will be cured. Wait a minute though that can’t be right we would be perfect, whoa, no, no, no. OK all repaired but not perfect that’s right. Check it out, Insight, Resurrection.
It all gets like a fairy story, Snow White and the seven dwarves. Believe it if you want, I don’t buy it.